🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.